| |||
| |
Saturday, October 08, 2011
Fw: Fwd: Stimulus money at work
Wednesday, August 24, 2011
IN SUPPORT OF THE TEA PARTY CONCEPT
I would like to enlighten POTUS, all politicians and especially, the Democratic (as well as any or all of those who consider the “tea party” insurgents or terrorists) about what is going on in the real world of the American people. Certainly, some of us are more acutely aware than others of what has been created, developed or permitted to evolve in this country. But, please take it from a real life senior citizen it is a mess out there!
I am not a member of the tea party (whatever membership in that organization involves) but I certainly subscribe to the validity of their complaints and support their motives. We all need to be on the street pointing out to all who can see and listen how truly “mismanaged” (the F word should have replaced truly but that might offend someone)we really are. It seems to me that an over educated group of mass ignorance is running our country. Did someone put something in the water that turned the masses into whimpering, blubbering idiots? Is it terrorism under the guise of intellectual superiority?
I am not sure whether our problems are a result of the “dumbing down” of our society or whether everyone is simply incompetent, over regulated or educated beyond their intelligence. Whatever the reason, it has become next to impossible to get anything done in any format that is, in any way, intimidated by the political scene. It is time that our elected officials wise up and listen to the voices of the tea party and others who are “mad as hell and not gonna take it any more”. We must confront the dreadful disease of incompetent malaise that is overcoming every facet of our daily lives. Contrary to what the Democratic Party (and those elected to office with similar views that I choose to call dirty liberal Republicans) would have us believe, the tea party is not the problem. Our elected officials (President, Congress and the political thought process that conceived them) are the problem.
My husband and I are 80 and 78 years old respectively. We have a home loan that we would like to repay but to do so, would create another tax burden as a 401K disbursement. In an apparent effort to be good stewards of our personal finances, we decided to take advantage of better loan rates that were offered to us by a home loan mortgage broker who offered us a desirable lower interest rate. Our existing company said they could give us the same rate with only an update of financial information provided to them just one year ago. Nothing of significance had changed since then so we elected to go with our existing company. We were not concerned, our credit rating is pristine. What problem could we have?
That was in June. In the ensuing months, we have had to provide documentation that we have never had to provide before in connection with any loan application and we have had many. They required details from my pension fund, a life insurance annuity in lifetime payout, pension data and term, proof and reason for every bank transfer, every financial transaction that we have entered into over the year, from whom it came, what it was for and why it was made) and the list goes on and on. For every delay, updates of previously submitted documents had to be provided until we have been inundated with paperwork and related costs and still the simple renewal has not closed.
We have become so disenchanted with the bank and what we have been through that we are considering canceling our loan and, once a new loan has been negotiated, we will move all of our business to another bank.
I understand the need for checks and balances. Certainly, if we had ever engaged in illegal activities or had a history of defrauding our business associates their concerns would be relevant. However, it is apparently not politically correct to check one person more thoroughly than another – so everyone must be treated as criminals?
We are told the increased scrutiny is as a result of new finance regulations. We understand that the new regulations were implemented because people did not do their job in the past. However, instead of enforcing the laws that existed or tightening the enforcement process, more rules and regulations were enacted to assure protection from the people who didn’t violate the previous laws. Really makes a lot of sense, don’t you think?
I personally feel that we are over regulated and micro managed to the point that we are left feeling like crooks. In the past only those with questionable credit and background were subjected to endless scrutiny into their personal affairs. During that process those people learned how to “beat the system”. Now, everyone is a crook until proven otherwise. Is this the change that we can believe in? Rather than enforce laws already on the books, our politicians want to micro manage with more laws, regulations and oversight. As a consequence nothing gets done and our country remains stagnant and without heart. People lose confidence, become depressed and we have a “Catch 22” syndrome. Let’s face it – laws are written to assure that the most jobs that can be created will be created to support the reason for more dysfunctional government. And in the process, dysfunction will kill the goose that lays the golden eggs just as unions and government regulations have contributed to companies removing their manufacturing overseas in order to be competitive Sort of makes you feel all warm and fuzzy about our future doesn't it?
It seems to me that the real terrorists are those we elected to serve as our representatives. It is time for all of us to take a good look at just who we are selecting to serve us both on the local, State and Federal level. We have earned our current mess but isn’t it time that we paid them back with what they deserve – defeat???
I know that I am old and that I tend to live in the past, but I remember when you went to your local banker who knew you, knew your family and knew first hand your personal business strengths and weakness. He could tell you face to face what he could and couldn’t do. He didn’t have to worry that you might sue him for one of the innumerable counts of “protectionism” that has been put on the books to curtail business and manage our affairs. In those days,my parents and perhaps, yours, stood on their own record and that was sufficient. No endless paperwork, no large staff of accountants, no team of lawyers and no review board to determine whether you were worthy of a companies trust. With our laws and the endless efforts by incompetent politician’s to help us avoid malfeasance, we no longer have a free society. We have a “free loading” society.
Why would any of us criticize the good citizens who are members of the tea party? They are exercising that in which they believe. If we don’t act now and change the way things are done, a mid-east spring may be in our future and it may be led by senior citizens like me who are simply fed up. We have a mess. Our laws are so confused, complicated and inept that we need to wipe the slate clean and start over with only the constitution as our guide.
Whatever is happening in our government today isn’t working. More power to the tea party, less power to our elected officials and perhaps, YOU need to remind them of just how fed up YOU are. Write your Senator, Congressman or woman, the President and every news bureau and let them know that you are FED UP AND NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANY MORE.
I am not a member of the tea party (whatever membership in that organization involves) but I certainly subscribe to the validity of their complaints and support their motives. We all need to be on the street pointing out to all who can see and listen how truly “mismanaged” (the F word should have replaced truly but that might offend someone)we really are. It seems to me that an over educated group of mass ignorance is running our country. Did someone put something in the water that turned the masses into whimpering, blubbering idiots? Is it terrorism under the guise of intellectual superiority?
I am not sure whether our problems are a result of the “dumbing down” of our society or whether everyone is simply incompetent, over regulated or educated beyond their intelligence. Whatever the reason, it has become next to impossible to get anything done in any format that is, in any way, intimidated by the political scene. It is time that our elected officials wise up and listen to the voices of the tea party and others who are “mad as hell and not gonna take it any more”. We must confront the dreadful disease of incompetent malaise that is overcoming every facet of our daily lives. Contrary to what the Democratic Party (and those elected to office with similar views that I choose to call dirty liberal Republicans) would have us believe, the tea party is not the problem. Our elected officials (President, Congress and the political thought process that conceived them) are the problem.
My husband and I are 80 and 78 years old respectively. We have a home loan that we would like to repay but to do so, would create another tax burden as a 401K disbursement. In an apparent effort to be good stewards of our personal finances, we decided to take advantage of better loan rates that were offered to us by a home loan mortgage broker who offered us a desirable lower interest rate. Our existing company said they could give us the same rate with only an update of financial information provided to them just one year ago. Nothing of significance had changed since then so we elected to go with our existing company. We were not concerned, our credit rating is pristine. What problem could we have?
That was in June. In the ensuing months, we have had to provide documentation that we have never had to provide before in connection with any loan application and we have had many. They required details from my pension fund, a life insurance annuity in lifetime payout, pension data and term, proof and reason for every bank transfer, every financial transaction that we have entered into over the year, from whom it came, what it was for and why it was made) and the list goes on and on. For every delay, updates of previously submitted documents had to be provided until we have been inundated with paperwork and related costs and still the simple renewal has not closed.
We have become so disenchanted with the bank and what we have been through that we are considering canceling our loan and, once a new loan has been negotiated, we will move all of our business to another bank.
I understand the need for checks and balances. Certainly, if we had ever engaged in illegal activities or had a history of defrauding our business associates their concerns would be relevant. However, it is apparently not politically correct to check one person more thoroughly than another – so everyone must be treated as criminals?
We are told the increased scrutiny is as a result of new finance regulations. We understand that the new regulations were implemented because people did not do their job in the past. However, instead of enforcing the laws that existed or tightening the enforcement process, more rules and regulations were enacted to assure protection from the people who didn’t violate the previous laws. Really makes a lot of sense, don’t you think?
I personally feel that we are over regulated and micro managed to the point that we are left feeling like crooks. In the past only those with questionable credit and background were subjected to endless scrutiny into their personal affairs. During that process those people learned how to “beat the system”. Now, everyone is a crook until proven otherwise. Is this the change that we can believe in? Rather than enforce laws already on the books, our politicians want to micro manage with more laws, regulations and oversight. As a consequence nothing gets done and our country remains stagnant and without heart. People lose confidence, become depressed and we have a “Catch 22” syndrome. Let’s face it – laws are written to assure that the most jobs that can be created will be created to support the reason for more dysfunctional government. And in the process, dysfunction will kill the goose that lays the golden eggs just as unions and government regulations have contributed to companies removing their manufacturing overseas in order to be competitive Sort of makes you feel all warm and fuzzy about our future doesn't it?
It seems to me that the real terrorists are those we elected to serve as our representatives. It is time for all of us to take a good look at just who we are selecting to serve us both on the local, State and Federal level. We have earned our current mess but isn’t it time that we paid them back with what they deserve – defeat???
I know that I am old and that I tend to live in the past, but I remember when you went to your local banker who knew you, knew your family and knew first hand your personal business strengths and weakness. He could tell you face to face what he could and couldn’t do. He didn’t have to worry that you might sue him for one of the innumerable counts of “protectionism” that has been put on the books to curtail business and manage our affairs. In those days,my parents and perhaps, yours, stood on their own record and that was sufficient. No endless paperwork, no large staff of accountants, no team of lawyers and no review board to determine whether you were worthy of a companies trust. With our laws and the endless efforts by incompetent politician’s to help us avoid malfeasance, we no longer have a free society. We have a “free loading” society.
Why would any of us criticize the good citizens who are members of the tea party? They are exercising that in which they believe. If we don’t act now and change the way things are done, a mid-east spring may be in our future and it may be led by senior citizens like me who are simply fed up. We have a mess. Our laws are so confused, complicated and inept that we need to wipe the slate clean and start over with only the constitution as our guide.
Whatever is happening in our government today isn’t working. More power to the tea party, less power to our elected officials and perhaps, YOU need to remind them of just how fed up YOU are. Write your Senator, Congressman or woman, the President and every news bureau and let them know that you are FED UP AND NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANY MORE.
Friday, February 18, 2011
ROCKING CHAIR COMMENTARY
Perhaps the people who are protesting in Wisconsin should be introduced to the old fashioned paddle that my teacher used when I was a kid?
Wednesday, February 09, 2011
RIGHT OF DISSENT
During President George W. Bush's administration, the attacks on his
policies were never ending. It was alleged that President Bush was lacking
in IQ. (We learned after the Kerry-Bush campaign that Bush' college grades
equaled or exceeded John Kerry's, but the negative point had been made.).
http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/columnist/benedetto/2005-06-10-benedetto_x.htm
August 10, 2005, Richard Benedeto wrote While the general impression during the 2004 presidential campaign was that Democrat John Kerry was the intellectual superior to President Bush, it turns out that their grades
while undergraduate students at Yale were remarkably similar. In fact, Bush's were a tad higher. His four-year average was 77; Kerry's 76. Both were C students. Kerry graduated from Yale in 1966;Bush in 1968President Bush was criticized for being a liar because no weapons of mass
destruction were found in Iraq, ridiculed for his lack of communication
skills and every mispronounced word was headlined. As a person who supported
the Bush presidency, I accepted these outbursts of dissatisfaction as
necessary to credibility. Dissent promotes an examination of truth.
policies were never ending. It was alleged that President Bush was lacking
in IQ. (We learned after the Kerry-Bush campaign that Bush' college grades
equaled or exceeded John Kerry's, but the negative point had been made.).
http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/columnist/benedetto/2005-06-10-benedetto_x.htm
August 10, 2005, Richard Benedeto wrote While the general impression during the 2004 presidential campaign was that Democrat John Kerry was the intellectual superior to President Bush, it turns out that their grades
while undergraduate students at Yale were remarkably similar. In fact, Bush's were a tad higher. His four-year average was 77; Kerry's 76. Both were C students. Kerry graduated from Yale in 1966;Bush in 1968President Bush was criticized for being a liar because no weapons of mass
destruction were found in Iraq, ridiculed for his lack of communication
skills and every mispronounced word was headlined. As a person who supported
the Bush presidency, I accepted these outbursts of dissatisfaction as
necessary to credibility. Dissent promotes an examination of truth.
Today, disagreements with the administration incites verbal attacks that
accuses those who dissent of flawed thoughts and inferior IQ. Dissent abuse
has become particularly loud against Sarah Palin and the tea party movement.
Intimidation of those who disagree with the preconceived ideas of elitist
is practiced freely. Both the verbal left and right seem to believe
that free speech should be limited to their speech. Personally, I am
offended by those who would attack dissenting views. My disdain is not
limited to those who may disagree with me. We do not have to agree with the
view of others, but good manners requires that we respect them. Dissent is
a two way street and should be equally cherished and protected by all.
Many of my friends do not share my political philosophy or my personal
values. They are not flawed. They see the world through a different prism.
They judge with a different yardstick. Because I know these people to be
good, well intentioned, compassionate and caring people, Irespect their concerns, ideas and beliefs. I may even agree with some of their concerns but I want to hear their reasons, their logic and explore their motives.Although I may disagree with them, they need to hear themselves make their own case. I have found that our positions can best be understood when we personally communicate them.
Sometimes the mere exchange of ideas causes us to glimpse the vulnerability
of our position. We need the insight that debate provides but that debate
needs to be logical, reasoned and spoke in a spirit of learning. I do not
want to be intimidated into accepting truth where truth does not exist.
The media should be asking the questions, probing the positions and
enlightening our understanding, but it does not. Thus, we must rely on
people who have the courage to ask the questions, suggest alternatives and explore
the possibilities. Free speech is key to survival for our way of life.
My mother who had only an elementary education had a favorite cliché that
she often shared with me. "THERE IS MORE THAN ONE WAY TO SKIN A CAT". Today her simple cliché would undoubtedly raise an outcry from PETA (mind you, I do not recommend skinning a cat) but the phrase suggests there may be
alternatives. That, it seems to me, is an application for American
ingenuity. Those who think they have answers should welcome and
encourage debate and welcome authentication of their ideas. The debate of
ideas should be recognized as a combined exercise of free speech and a
search for wisdom. The Obama administration and its supporters should
welcome discussion and questions of their positions. In fact, shouldn't the
questions raised by those who site the dissenters as educationally
challenged take precedence for analysis and, thus, reveal the value of the concept and the soundness of its premise?
Monday, May 03, 2010
Monday, April 19, 2010
FOOD FOR THOUGHT
I never cease to be amazed at the audacity of people who choose to believe that they have the right to say and do anything in defense of their positions, but that others should lie down, be quiet and abide by the will of others. Such is the State of our country and it is not a good State.
Wednesday, December 09, 2009
A PROPER RESPONSE TO ANOTHER INCOMPETENT BUREAUCRAT
Ms. Cindy Williams, Assistant Director for Natrional Security in the Congressional Budget office. wrote a piece for the Washington Times, denouncing the pay raise(s) coming service members' way this year. She stated that the 13% wage increase was more than they deserve.
A young airman from Hill AFB responds to her article below. He ought to get a bonus for this.
"Ms Williams: I just had the pleasure of reading your column, "Our GIs earn enough" and I am a bit confused. Frankly, I'm wondering where this vaunted overpayment is going, because as far as I can tell, it disappears every month between DFAS (The Defense Finance and Accounting Service) and my bank account. Checking my latest earnings statement I see that I make $1,117.80 before taxes per month. After taxes, I take home $874.20. When I run that through the calculator, I come up with an annual salary of $13,413.60 before taxes, and $10,490.40, after.
I work in the Air Force Network Control Center where I am part of the team responsible for a 5,000 host computer network. I am involved with infrastructure segments, specifically with Cisco Systems equipment. A quick check under jobs for Network Technicians in the Washington, D.C. area reveals a position in my career field, requiring three years experience with my job. Amazingly, this job does NOT pay $13,413.60 a year. No, this job is being offered at $70,000 to $80,000 per annum........... I'm sure you can draw the obvious conclusions.
Given the tenor of your column, I would assume that you NEVER had the pleasure of serving your country in her armed forces. Before you take it upon yourself to once more castigate congressional and DOD leadership for attempting to get the families in the military's lowest pay brackets off of WIC and food stamps, I suggest that you join a group of deploying soldiers headed for AFGHANISTAN; I leave the choice of service branch up to you. Whatever choice you make, though, opt for the SIX month rotation: it will guarantee you the longest possible time away from your family and friends, thus giving you full "deployment experience."
As your group prepares to board the plane, make sure to note the spouses and children who are saying good-bye to their loved ones. Also take care to note that several families are still unsure of how they'll be able to make ends meet while the primary breadwinner is gone - obviously they've been squandering the "vast" piles of cash the government has been giving them.
Try to deploy over a major holiday; Christmas and Thanksgiving are perennial favorites. And when you're actually over there, sitting in a foxhole, shivering against the cold desert night; and the flight sergeant tells you that there aren't enough people on shift to relieve you for chow, remember this: trade whatever MRE (meal-ready- to-eat) you manage to get for the tuna noodle casserole or cheese tortellini, and add Tabasco to everything. This gives some flavor.
Talk to your loved ones as often as you are permitted; it won't nearly be long enough or often enough, but take what you can get and be thankful for it. You may have picked up on the fact that I disagree with most of the points you present in your opened piece.
But, tomorrow from KABUL , I will defend to the death your right to say it.
You see, I am an American fighting man, a guarantor of your First Amendment rights and every other right you cherish. On a daily basis, my brother and sister soldiers worldwide ensure that you and people like you can thumb your collective nose at us, all on a salary that is nothing short of pitiful and under conditions that would make most people cringe. We hemorrhage our best and brightest into the private sector because we can't offer the stability and pay of civilian companies.
And you, Ms. Williams, have the gall to say that we make more than we deserve? You can kiss my royal red a**!!!
A1C Michael Bragg Hill AFB AFNCC
IF YOU AGREE, PLEASE PASS THIS ALONG TO AS MANY PEOPLE AS POSSIBLE AND SHOW YOUR SUPPORT OF THE AMERICAN FIGHTING MEN AND WOMEN. THANK YOU No comments:
Monday, October 12, 2009
TRIP ITINERARY AND E MAIL CONTACT
Ken and I depart for Wales, Ireland and Scotland Thursday, October 15. We plan to keep you updated on our experiences and adventures with regular blogs posted to patsgazette.com and we will monitor mail sent to pat@patsgazette.com. If you wish you can direct your e mails to us from patsgazette.com.
We request that you do not send any forwarded messages of non essential information to pat@patsgazette.com. All forwarded mail or FYI enlightenment of political ,entertainment or commentary on the state of incompetence posed by the public in general should be sent to: korpburns@att.net or burns-kenneth@att.net. We look forward to catching up with the realitys posed by those gems of nonsense when we return but we hope to be too busy enjoying the countryside and sights of the United Kingdom to deal with the lighter side of life while on the road.
Keep us in your thoughts as we wander through the castles and see the countryside of the United Kingdom with a view predominately from the left (at least from the road!)
p
Monday, September 28, 2009
ANOTHER LETTER TO MY REPRESENTATIVES IN WASHINGTON DC
I am one of those irrational people against health care reform as it is presently known. I believe in the views and support the people who appeared at town hall meetings all over the country during the summer. Those people expressed their opposition to the current health care bill and their general distrust and discontent with their political representatives. In my opinion, they reflected the majority views of my age group and my sphere of friends. They were not remotely “turf”. They were frustrated individuals who want their representatives to listen to us to our views and act with wisdom and concern. They expressed my feelings and reflected my personal negative views on health care, the energy tax, tarp and the state of incompetence that you and your fellow representatives have practiced to date. We are fed up, frustrated and unable to stand quietly by while the current administration and its followers put nail after nail into the coffin of my beloved country.
I am a disgruntled constituent. I cannot believe that our elected representatives are voting on and passing legislation that they have neither read or understand. That absolutely “blows my mind”. Any politician who votes for a bill that they have not personally read and understand should be removed from office. We, the American people have an obligation to let you know that the current level of accrued debt and the out of control spending must be stopped. We cannot afford the bills that are being submitted, approved and passed. We are broke!!! My opposition has nothing to do with race, right wing extremism or whatever symbolic language that your latest focus group might label me. I believe that the current opposition is based on different visions, beliefs and commitments. It is time you listened to the other side and heard our plea. The opposition is not right on all matters. Neither are you!! I can assure you that I can hardly wait for next year’s elections because change is needed and badly in both parties.
I continue to hear that the opponents have no plan. I happen to like many of the amendments that the opposition has put forth and that have been rejected by the majority party. My major concerns for health care are as follows:
- Let’s fix what is broken in our health care and gradually implement changes that will make a difference.
- Whatever plan is ultimately agreed upon, it should also apply to every government worker, member of Congress and the vast governmental bureaucracy. If it isn’t good enough for the government, it isn’t good enough for our citizens.
- All bills should be posted on the internet at least 72 hours before a vote is conducted;
- No government plan. I believe firmly that once the government gets involved business will “opt out” of health care as a benefit. No matter what assurances you or the president or anyone in the government gives me, I believe this will happen;
These are but a few of my health care considerations, but I will not bore you with a detailed account because I am “worldly” enough to realize that you really don’t give a dam and that it is a hopeless effort on my part. I have written this only because I think I need to be on record, not that I think it will be read by the addressee in spite of what I expect will be your regular canned chain response with “focus group” phrases.
Saturday, September 26, 2009
THE STATE OF OUR HYPROCRISY
Where is our honesty? Is there no commitment to justice or fairness? We give lip service to being a country run by the “rule of law”. This week, in an area where our forefathers fought for the principles of democracy and freedom, the political process stretched this premise to the limit. The State of Massachusetts passed a provision that permitted a sitting Governor to appoint a temporary Senator to replace the late Senator Ted Kennedy. This law was passed to directly contradict a law passed to deny a sitting Governor of an opposing political party that same right. When our politicians “stoop” deliberately and in full public view to act in this manner in open disregard for fairness and the people look on in approval why should ordinary American citizens take to seriously the “rule of law”? Have we no shame?
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
HEALTH CARE
A lot is being said about the necessity to pass health care now. It seems to me that the most important thing is to get it right and rushing through a long drawn out version of legal nonsense that no one understands (including the authors) is a terrible disservice to the American people.
Sunday, August 23, 2009
WHAT IS WRONG WITH DEBATE?
When I was a child our family gatherings were opportunities for family discussions and vigorous debates. After a family noon day meal,shared in close family unity, the conversation would turn from family orientation and family topics of mutual interest to politics and issues of the day. These discussions would be healthy, heated and varied. My older brothers and sisters disagreed on many issues not only among themselves but with my father, whose political positions were strong and well known to family, friends and enemies alike. The debates were lively. Though these discussions would not see the “light of day” in the halls of Congress or in any arena of decision making consequence, it helped everyone formulate their position, reaffirm or question his or her own belief and prepared them for the decisions that they would make at the ballot box. Most of all, we learned to respect that differences of opinion provides the roots to the freedoms that makes our country special. We learned at a young age to question, analyze and by doing so, we learned to make decisions based on merit as we saw it.
I am shocked that the Democratic left and the news media cannot and does not encourage this kind of expression of ideas. Oh, they might say that they certainly encourage family debate -- but what about public debate with their elected officials? That anyone should think that one man or one parties proposed solution should be above analysis and disagreement is beyond my comprehension. Yet that seems to me to be the message forthcoming from our President and his Administration. Although I am very concerned about the socialization of America that seems to be the intent of many of the ideas coming from the current administration, I am more afraid of the failure to accept debate as a necessary American reaction to political ideas. Further, the seeming lack of appreciation by the news media for the simple thought process of our citizens who disagree with the President and the administration is to me simply traumatic. Where is the basic root expression that our journalists and news media are supposed to research and dispense?
What has happened to our country when the President of the United States condemns disagreement and wants to stifle debate? When the President himself attacks a news media that dares express debate about current events, should we not be up in arms? I am shocked that every newsperson in our country is not concerned and condemning the President and his political cronies. Few are doing so and those who do, are condemned by Pelosi, Reed, Obama and their Democratic comrades who were elected to serve the citizens of our great country.
America – it is time we all woke up and recognized that the change that you thought you were getting is not change at all, it is a war on our American principles and the American dream. My mother, father and siblings have all passed away. They were life long Democrats and they surely must be turning over in their grave as the very spirit of our country has turned from one of individual responsibility to unearned dependence”. The party in whom my family placed their loyalty now empowers dependence on the Government and the principles and values that I learned at those family gatherings so long ago, are no longer applicable. I think that they, as religious, dedicated believers, would also be disappointed to know that their faith is under attack as well.
We need to wake up!!! We need to make our voices heard!!! And we need to just say NO to Obama’s plan to further burden us with his plan for a socialized America. And – in case you are wondering – I am not beholden to any lobbyist, insurance company or political party in any way. I am just a freedom loving American citizen who is scared for the plight of my country.
I am shocked that the Democratic left and the news media cannot and does not encourage this kind of expression of ideas. Oh, they might say that they certainly encourage family debate -- but what about public debate with their elected officials? That anyone should think that one man or one parties proposed solution should be above analysis and disagreement is beyond my comprehension. Yet that seems to me to be the message forthcoming from our President and his Administration. Although I am very concerned about the socialization of America that seems to be the intent of many of the ideas coming from the current administration, I am more afraid of the failure to accept debate as a necessary American reaction to political ideas. Further, the seeming lack of appreciation by the news media for the simple thought process of our citizens who disagree with the President and the administration is to me simply traumatic. Where is the basic root expression that our journalists and news media are supposed to research and dispense?
What has happened to our country when the President of the United States condemns disagreement and wants to stifle debate? When the President himself attacks a news media that dares express debate about current events, should we not be up in arms? I am shocked that every newsperson in our country is not concerned and condemning the President and his political cronies. Few are doing so and those who do, are condemned by Pelosi, Reed, Obama and their Democratic comrades who were elected to serve the citizens of our great country.
America – it is time we all woke up and recognized that the change that you thought you were getting is not change at all, it is a war on our American principles and the American dream. My mother, father and siblings have all passed away. They were life long Democrats and they surely must be turning over in their grave as the very spirit of our country has turned from one of individual responsibility to unearned dependence”. The party in whom my family placed their loyalty now empowers dependence on the Government and the principles and values that I learned at those family gatherings so long ago, are no longer applicable. I think that they, as religious, dedicated believers, would also be disappointed to know that their faith is under attack as well.
We need to wake up!!! We need to make our voices heard!!! And we need to just say NO to Obama’s plan to further burden us with his plan for a socialized America. And – in case you are wondering – I am not beholden to any lobbyist, insurance company or political party in any way. I am just a freedom loving American citizen who is scared for the plight of my country.
Friday, July 24, 2009
MR PRESIDENT ARE YOU MISGUIDED OR BIASED?
Mr. President you misspoke regarding the Cambridge incident and you should apologize to Sgt. Crowley, the American people and all reputable police organizations. You involved yourself in this matter and now you are accusing the news media of obsession with your remarks. They are doing their job. They are covering your friend's claim of racial profiling and you wrongly chose to get involved, without knowing the facts.
Would you want the police and/or the news media to avoid covering an incident that reflected true racial profiling? Once again, Mr. President, you are trying to control the news media. You have put your loyalty to a friend above your elected position. This is wrong. Mr. President you violated the trust of the American people. Your comments were not Presidential. Further they could even be called "stupid" a phrase that I believe you can appreciate.
Would you want the police and/or the news media to avoid covering an incident that reflected true racial profiling? Once again, Mr. President, you are trying to control the news media. You have put your loyalty to a friend above your elected position. This is wrong. Mr. President you violated the trust of the American people. Your comments were not Presidential. Further they could even be called "stupid" a phrase that I believe you can appreciate.
Monday, July 20, 2009
AN OPEN LETTER TO PRESIDENT OBAMA
EXACTLY WHAT IS GOING ON?
Mr. President and Congressional Representatives: A mammoth budget breaking stimulus bill was passed earlier this year. Many of you admitted that you did not read the bill before you voted on it. The “Cap and Trade” bill, now languishing in the Senate, was similarly rushed through the House without proper review or analysis. Now Mr. President, you are demanding that Congress pass a health care bill by a date certain. Again, you are sitting the stage for passage of bills that have not been read, debated or properly vetted by the American citizens. In short, you are engaged in an effort to dupe the American public by keeping them unaware and uninformed of what is within the bills that are being passed by Congress and that you are signing into law. I feel like I am being “sold down the river” by you and those who are supporting your agenda, Democrat or Republican.
Mr. President you were elected on a platform for change. Change should herald improvement and progress. It needs to be debated openly, reviewed with due diligence, implemented with care and understood by those who must pay the bill. Its impact and cost must be justified. This is not happening. So far your programs not only seem ineffective in their overall provisions but they are a burden to our already crisis ridden economy and will burden our children for more than a lifetime. In my view, your vision and that of your Democratic controlled Congress is flawed and jeopardizes our freedom, independence and ability to engage in American ingenuity. Personally, I feel that I am surrounded by an incompetent and defunct political system that is supposed to protect my country and serve the best interests of all our citizens.
I wish to be on record as opposing passage of the “cap and trade” bill. Further, I am opposed to any health care program that has not been read by every person who votes on the bill and that has not had proper debate, analysis and review by those who would vote on it and the citizens who will pay for it. Mr. President, if education is so important to you, it is time you and our elected officials let the American people practice their reading skills. This seems to me to be “elementary” Mr. President.
I also believe that the final health care program and its provisions should apply to all members of the government and its hierarchy without prejudice. In short, whatever program that is available to you and all who serve in a government capacity, should be the same program that you and Congress has developed for me and my fellow citizens. . Only then will I feel that I may be getting a “fair shake” in the reorganization of our health care system. At least, I will feel that I am an equal.
In closing, I wish to advise you that I am fed up with your socialistic agenda. Further I sadly question your loyalty and that of the Democratic party to the America that I love. The country of your vision is not the country that my parents taught me to believe in. They and my family were life long Democrats. My heart cries out for them and that in which they believed.
Mr. President you were elected on a platform for change. Change should herald improvement and progress. It needs to be debated openly, reviewed with due diligence, implemented with care and understood by those who must pay the bill. Its impact and cost must be justified. This is not happening. So far your programs not only seem ineffective in their overall provisions but they are a burden to our already crisis ridden economy and will burden our children for more than a lifetime. In my view, your vision and that of your Democratic controlled Congress is flawed and jeopardizes our freedom, independence and ability to engage in American ingenuity. Personally, I feel that I am surrounded by an incompetent and defunct political system that is supposed to protect my country and serve the best interests of all our citizens.
I wish to be on record as opposing passage of the “cap and trade” bill. Further, I am opposed to any health care program that has not been read by every person who votes on the bill and that has not had proper debate, analysis and review by those who would vote on it and the citizens who will pay for it. Mr. President, if education is so important to you, it is time you and our elected officials let the American people practice their reading skills. This seems to me to be “elementary” Mr. President.
I also believe that the final health care program and its provisions should apply to all members of the government and its hierarchy without prejudice. In short, whatever program that is available to you and all who serve in a government capacity, should be the same program that you and Congress has developed for me and my fellow citizens. . Only then will I feel that I may be getting a “fair shake” in the reorganization of our health care system. At least, I will feel that I am an equal.
In closing, I wish to advise you that I am fed up with your socialistic agenda. Further I sadly question your loyalty and that of the Democratic party to the America that I love. The country of your vision is not the country that my parents taught me to believe in. They and my family were life long Democrats. My heart cries out for them and that in which they believed.
Saturday, July 04, 2009
GOVERNOR MARK SANFORD - HEEL EXTRAORDINAIRE
It is painful to watch our politicians fail so hopelessly. Governor Sanford comes to mind as the latest disappointment along with Senator John Ensign and before them, there have been a “slew” of politicians and people in high places who have fallen victims to what seems to be misplaced testosterone.
Let’s review. – Stories abound of the endless escapades of the Kennedys, starting with the patriarch, Joe, President John, Senator Bobby and last but not least, Senator Teddy. This was the family commonly thought to be highly endowed with liberal intellect on whose word we all clung shamelessly. In fact, they may have been a shade above the rest of us in charisma but common sense, principles, values and simple commitment were not well represented in their character. They all brought pain and suffering to their spouses.
Let us not forget the many rumors of “interests” by other persons of high repute i.e., Presidents Franklin Roosevelt and Dwight Eisenhower and who can forget the most notable of recent fame, Bill Clinton? Were there others? -- Certainly, notably Thomas Jefferson and wasn’t Benjamin Franklin accused of having a roving eye? Of course, no one can forget Prince Charles and his former paramour and now wife or the myriad of similar stories from other countries that abound. Unlike we Americans, many other countries throughout the World see the issues relating to illicit sex as nothing more than the “expected antics from an ‘old boys network’” that is alive and well. However, in addition to the recent tearful expressions of contrition by Senator Ensign and Governor Sanford, there is the prior conduct of fellow politicians such as Gary Hart, John Edwards, Elliott Spitzer, Larry Craig, Mark Foley, David Vitter to name those of fairly recent reporting As far as I can tell, the stories of adultery seem evenly distributed between Republicans and Democrats. I suppose that we can assume that simple stupidity and an over engaged sexual magnetism by deprived egos seeking satisfaction outside the parameters of accepted values is not limited to one party or another.
This is a long list of philanders, but I feel sure that these are just the “tip of the iceberg”. How many people have committed similar acts and seemingly “got away with it” or simply ended an existing relationship by means of divorce and moved on? In today’s world there is hardly a family that is the product of one marriage but increasingly, there is the current spouse, the ex spouse and sometimes several ex’s both male and female. There are his children, her children and their children. Who knows, maybe there are also the “unnamed children”? There are the spouses, mates, friends and “significant others”. What will we think of next? In fact, maybe we will embrace the mid east stereotype of several wives?
Unspoken for the most part, are the many examples of women who are guilty of the same acts of adultery as those herein outlined. In short, our society today is filled with unkept promises, unfaithfulness, lack of principle and no moral character. Increasingly in today’s society women are “opting out of marriages” on their own. Just a few years ago women were stuck in bad marriages and thought that they had no alternative to “making do” with what they had. Today, they are electing to end a “bad marriage” and are insisting that husbands share not only the responsibility for support but also share equally in the day to day events of child rearing. Good for them!!!
I was deeply impressed with Jenny Sanford’s response to her husband’s infidelity. She did not attempt hypocrisy by standing beside her husband while he made excuses for his “love story”. She rightly left him to turn in the heat from the “fire pit” that he, personally, had stoked.
His comments have served only to reassert the degree of his total selfishness and his lack of love or caring for his wife or the children he sired. He is a man who I would judge as having been on the receiving end of total unselfish and devoted love. A wife who gave up her career, abandoned her pivotal role in a life style of comfort and security, moved to South Carolina to be a wife, mother and political partner and who worked endlessly to help him achieve his ambitions. He has repaid her with his uncomplimentary remarks about his “love story” for another. In my judgment, this is not a love story. It is the height of selfishness and ego? If there is a love story here – it is not Mark Sanford’s. It is Jenny Sanford’s traditional commitment to her mate, family values, devotion to duty and belief in the potential and future of “her man” who, in the end, completely abandoned her in an act of selfish ego.
I hope that Jenny Sanford throws the beast out and accepts that the husband she loved and did everything for has fallen in love with another. In the process he handed his wife and his children the deepest humiliation that a husband and father can give those who unselfishly loved and trusted him. He discarded any symbolic expression that might otherwise have suggested that he ever was a responsible husband, father or person of family values. Only Mrs. Sanford can decide what is right for her and her children. In my opinion Mark Sanford should be put on the next ship to Argentina where he might live ever after with his paramour and write his great “love story”. It will undoubtedly be a mythical vision of an enlarged organ that briefly replaced his brain.
Let’s review. – Stories abound of the endless escapades of the Kennedys, starting with the patriarch, Joe, President John, Senator Bobby and last but not least, Senator Teddy. This was the family commonly thought to be highly endowed with liberal intellect on whose word we all clung shamelessly. In fact, they may have been a shade above the rest of us in charisma but common sense, principles, values and simple commitment were not well represented in their character. They all brought pain and suffering to their spouses.
Let us not forget the many rumors of “interests” by other persons of high repute i.e., Presidents Franklin Roosevelt and Dwight Eisenhower and who can forget the most notable of recent fame, Bill Clinton? Were there others? -- Certainly, notably Thomas Jefferson and wasn’t Benjamin Franklin accused of having a roving eye? Of course, no one can forget Prince Charles and his former paramour and now wife or the myriad of similar stories from other countries that abound. Unlike we Americans, many other countries throughout the World see the issues relating to illicit sex as nothing more than the “expected antics from an ‘old boys network’” that is alive and well. However, in addition to the recent tearful expressions of contrition by Senator Ensign and Governor Sanford, there is the prior conduct of fellow politicians such as Gary Hart, John Edwards, Elliott Spitzer, Larry Craig, Mark Foley, David Vitter to name those of fairly recent reporting As far as I can tell, the stories of adultery seem evenly distributed between Republicans and Democrats. I suppose that we can assume that simple stupidity and an over engaged sexual magnetism by deprived egos seeking satisfaction outside the parameters of accepted values is not limited to one party or another.
This is a long list of philanders, but I feel sure that these are just the “tip of the iceberg”. How many people have committed similar acts and seemingly “got away with it” or simply ended an existing relationship by means of divorce and moved on? In today’s world there is hardly a family that is the product of one marriage but increasingly, there is the current spouse, the ex spouse and sometimes several ex’s both male and female. There are his children, her children and their children. Who knows, maybe there are also the “unnamed children”? There are the spouses, mates, friends and “significant others”. What will we think of next? In fact, maybe we will embrace the mid east stereotype of several wives?
Unspoken for the most part, are the many examples of women who are guilty of the same acts of adultery as those herein outlined. In short, our society today is filled with unkept promises, unfaithfulness, lack of principle and no moral character. Increasingly in today’s society women are “opting out of marriages” on their own. Just a few years ago women were stuck in bad marriages and thought that they had no alternative to “making do” with what they had. Today, they are electing to end a “bad marriage” and are insisting that husbands share not only the responsibility for support but also share equally in the day to day events of child rearing. Good for them!!!
I was deeply impressed with Jenny Sanford’s response to her husband’s infidelity. She did not attempt hypocrisy by standing beside her husband while he made excuses for his “love story”. She rightly left him to turn in the heat from the “fire pit” that he, personally, had stoked.
His comments have served only to reassert the degree of his total selfishness and his lack of love or caring for his wife or the children he sired. He is a man who I would judge as having been on the receiving end of total unselfish and devoted love. A wife who gave up her career, abandoned her pivotal role in a life style of comfort and security, moved to South Carolina to be a wife, mother and political partner and who worked endlessly to help him achieve his ambitions. He has repaid her with his uncomplimentary remarks about his “love story” for another. In my judgment, this is not a love story. It is the height of selfishness and ego? If there is a love story here – it is not Mark Sanford’s. It is Jenny Sanford’s traditional commitment to her mate, family values, devotion to duty and belief in the potential and future of “her man” who, in the end, completely abandoned her in an act of selfish ego.
I hope that Jenny Sanford throws the beast out and accepts that the husband she loved and did everything for has fallen in love with another. In the process he handed his wife and his children the deepest humiliation that a husband and father can give those who unselfishly loved and trusted him. He discarded any symbolic expression that might otherwise have suggested that he ever was a responsible husband, father or person of family values. Only Mrs. Sanford can decide what is right for her and her children. In my opinion Mark Sanford should be put on the next ship to Argentina where he might live ever after with his paramour and write his great “love story”. It will undoubtedly be a mythical vision of an enlarged organ that briefly replaced his brain.
Monday, June 29, 2009
THERE OUGHTA BE A LAW!!!!
On Friday, long days of debate and clamor culminated in the passage of HR 2454 the “American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009” or the so called “cap-and-trade bill”. The bill passed the U. S. Congress by a vote of 219 to 212. Eight Republicans voted for this bill. One might say that the Republicans carried this bill to victory. Shame on them.
I personally wish to be on record as recommending that every one of the Republicans should be returned, unceremoniously, to their profession of choice in he private sector in the next election. Of course, the same fate should rightly be passed to the Democrats who voted for the bill but given the state of the Democratic mentality, who could ask for such insight?
Although I have strong personal views about this vote, my greatest concern is that the bill was 1,201 pages long with an amendment of 300 pages attached to it in the “wee” hours of Friday morning. It was said that there was only one copy of this bill available to be shared by the entire Congress. If this is true, that is a travesty!!! America – do you realize what is happening? We have elected representatives who are representing us without reading or even knowing the full facts of the legal repercussions to which they are subjecting us. How can, or why would, anyone vote on a bill that they have not read and do not fully understand the contents therein?
This is the 2nd bill in 2009 that has been passed by our “erstwhile?” politicians without proper review and analysis. In this administration, speed has become the bulwark from which everything is done. Why is that? -- Perhaps because discussion and analysis would reveal the truth and the truth might prohibit good people of sound mind from acting with proper oversight? We are fast becoming a 3rd World thought process. What happened to the Presidential Candidate whose pivotal platform espoused cleaning up government, getting rid of lobbyists and running a transparent government? We now know that change is – Bush to Obama – elephant to donkey. Everything else remains the same. Except now, the news media embraces a government that robs us of our freedom and heralds it as messianic. And -- the news media wonders why the American people no longer subscribe to the pulp?
Perhaps we should pass a law that requires every Congressman and/or Senator to sit through the reading of a bill before it is voted on in either the Senate and/or the House of Representatives. Further they should be required to attest that they understand the contents on which they have voted – maybe we should ask them to take a test to verify the degree of their understanding before they vote? During the reading of the bill, the television cameras and the radio microphones should be transmitting the contents of the bill to the American people so that we can also know the bills contents as well as how many of the politicians were listening and how many were sleeping. Now President Obama—that would be change!!!
Of course, I can hear the cry of foul and the hysteria that “nothing would get done” because these provisions would hold up the passing of new business. So be it. Perhaps this would motivate shorter, more concise legislation and just perhaps, we might get some honest, hard working representation.
America – let’s vote the whole gang out and get a new group who really care for America and care what happens to the people who pay the bill for the incompetence that currently represents us. Everyone should start looking around for people who are committed to your principles, share your values, believe in your future, have a vision for tomorrow and are committed to stopping waste, fraud and the socialization of America.
I personally wish to be on record as recommending that every one of the Republicans should be returned, unceremoniously, to their profession of choice in he private sector in the next election. Of course, the same fate should rightly be passed to the Democrats who voted for the bill but given the state of the Democratic mentality, who could ask for such insight?
Although I have strong personal views about this vote, my greatest concern is that the bill was 1,201 pages long with an amendment of 300 pages attached to it in the “wee” hours of Friday morning. It was said that there was only one copy of this bill available to be shared by the entire Congress. If this is true, that is a travesty!!! America – do you realize what is happening? We have elected representatives who are representing us without reading or even knowing the full facts of the legal repercussions to which they are subjecting us. How can, or why would, anyone vote on a bill that they have not read and do not fully understand the contents therein?
This is the 2nd bill in 2009 that has been passed by our “erstwhile?” politicians without proper review and analysis. In this administration, speed has become the bulwark from which everything is done. Why is that? -- Perhaps because discussion and analysis would reveal the truth and the truth might prohibit good people of sound mind from acting with proper oversight? We are fast becoming a 3rd World thought process. What happened to the Presidential Candidate whose pivotal platform espoused cleaning up government, getting rid of lobbyists and running a transparent government? We now know that change is – Bush to Obama – elephant to donkey. Everything else remains the same. Except now, the news media embraces a government that robs us of our freedom and heralds it as messianic. And -- the news media wonders why the American people no longer subscribe to the pulp?
Perhaps we should pass a law that requires every Congressman and/or Senator to sit through the reading of a bill before it is voted on in either the Senate and/or the House of Representatives. Further they should be required to attest that they understand the contents on which they have voted – maybe we should ask them to take a test to verify the degree of their understanding before they vote? During the reading of the bill, the television cameras and the radio microphones should be transmitting the contents of the bill to the American people so that we can also know the bills contents as well as how many of the politicians were listening and how many were sleeping. Now President Obama—that would be change!!!
Of course, I can hear the cry of foul and the hysteria that “nothing would get done” because these provisions would hold up the passing of new business. So be it. Perhaps this would motivate shorter, more concise legislation and just perhaps, we might get some honest, hard working representation.
America – let’s vote the whole gang out and get a new group who really care for America and care what happens to the people who pay the bill for the incompetence that currently represents us. Everyone should start looking around for people who are committed to your principles, share your values, believe in your future, have a vision for tomorrow and are committed to stopping waste, fraud and the socialization of America.
Friday, June 26, 2009
CALIFORNIA’S FISCAL CRISES
If a family has an emergency they do whatever they have to do to meet that emergency. If their personal ability to meet that emergency requires cutting back and/or amending their lifestyle, they do it. Why can’t California’s politicians and government in general get that very elementary message? And, is this the same government to which we want to give more and more power to run our lives?
California has over spent for years. Now, the coffers are dry. It is obvious that things have to change and some services that we believed critical and absolute, may suffer. That is the price that must be paid for our failure to apply fiscal constraints when life (and the coffers) was fluent.
Would the legislators and the Governor of California please take note and do what they must do to get the State rolling. Taxes are not the answer. Already people are considering how to get away from the over spending, over taxation and over socialization of this beautiful State. It is time that California developed sound principles of fiscal management. If not, we the citizens need to make some radical changes in our government hierarchy!!! We need action today. That action needs to be in the form of cutting everything but the essentials of government until we can get a sound fiscal policy that will permit us to operate within our means.
California has over spent for years. Now, the coffers are dry. It is obvious that things have to change and some services that we believed critical and absolute, may suffer. That is the price that must be paid for our failure to apply fiscal constraints when life (and the coffers) was fluent.
Would the legislators and the Governor of California please take note and do what they must do to get the State rolling. Taxes are not the answer. Already people are considering how to get away from the over spending, over taxation and over socialization of this beautiful State. It is time that California developed sound principles of fiscal management. If not, we the citizens need to make some radical changes in our government hierarchy!!! We need action today. That action needs to be in the form of cutting everything but the essentials of government until we can get a sound fiscal policy that will permit us to operate within our means.
Wednesday, June 24, 2009
WHERE OH WHERE IS MY COUNTRY GOING?
My head reels from one disappointment to another as a result of the incompetence, ineptness and total disregard of American values by every politician in either the Federal, State or local governments. Does one have to be a crook, dishonest and totally without principle to be a politician? Frankly, it would seem so.
First, we have President O'bama who is obviously an intern trying to get his bearings on what it means to be President; Nancy Pelosi who was briefed by the CIA and totally missed the reason for the briefing -- then had the "gall" to say they lied to her; Diane Finestein supporting a bill that would enrich her husband's company through Governmental contracts and having the "gall" to deny that she knew it would benefit her husband; Chris Dodd, Barney Frank and the list goes on and on!
The above are reasons Democrats should be upset!!! The Republican list is just as bad with the latest John Ensign and Governor Sanford examples indicating just how low the Republican heirarchy has stooped.
Where do we go next people? We are indeed a country in trouble!!! Not only have we lost principle, logic, wisdom and family values -- we have lost responsibility, caring, love and commitment.
It is good to be old and know that one will not be around to reap the rewards of our stupidity!!!
First, we have President O'bama who is obviously an intern trying to get his bearings on what it means to be President; Nancy Pelosi who was briefed by the CIA and totally missed the reason for the briefing -- then had the "gall" to say they lied to her; Diane Finestein supporting a bill that would enrich her husband's company through Governmental contracts and having the "gall" to deny that she knew it would benefit her husband; Chris Dodd, Barney Frank and the list goes on and on!
The above are reasons Democrats should be upset!!! The Republican list is just as bad with the latest John Ensign and Governor Sanford examples indicating just how low the Republican heirarchy has stooped.
Where do we go next people? We are indeed a country in trouble!!! Not only have we lost principle, logic, wisdom and family values -- we have lost responsibility, caring, love and commitment.
It is good to be old and know that one will not be around to reap the rewards of our stupidity!!!
Thursday, October 23, 2008
WHY I AM NOT VOTING FOR SENATOR OBAMA
On November 4, I will cast my vote for John McCain. McCain was not my choice as a candidate to oppose the Democratic nominee but he is the only viable choice that I have. Senator Barak Hussein Obama is a gifted speaker and possesses the necessary traits to be a memorable politician. He has a bright future if he is as real as we would like him to be. I simply need to know a great deal more about him and see a lot more of his “good works” before I can vote for him to be President of this country that I love. Without a significant level of performance to back him up, he exhibits a demeanor of intellect but "where's the beef?" He is full of theory but will it work? I, for one, do not wish my country to be a global “guinea pig”. Senator O’bama has the idealism of youth, the arrogance of intellect and the elitism of inexperience. I am skeptical, a trait gained from having lived through a lifetime of unfulfilled promises from politicians.
The news media and those who support Senator Obama remind me of a story from my youth about the “EMPERORS NEW CLOTHES”. Like the little girl from that tale, I feel like I am alone in crying out that "the emperor has no clothes". The current hoopla suggests that there is no more to say or do. Our fate is sealed and Senator O'bama has closed the sale. The recent endorsement of Senator Obama from General Colin Powell seemed to suggest that the "crown" had been placed on the head. Unfortunately, many Americans will join this stampede and rush to judgment. I will NOT be voting for Senator Barak Hussein O’bama for the following reasons.
1. Patriotism. Simply, I doubt his patriotism. I remember the flag missing from his suit lapel and his failure to hold his hand over his heart during the pledge of allegiance to the flag during the earlydays in his campaign. I doubt his commitment to the freedoms that I value. In my opinion, he has not had enough time in office for me to conclude that he is what he would like us to think he is. I believe that Senator O’bama sees himself as a savior of the world, and not as a visionary for our great country. His aspirations may be good but are they good for us? I disagree with John McCain but I do not doubt his patriotism.
2. Wealth redistribution. I fear Senator O’bama’s stated commitment to “redistributing the wealth”. I know that 5% of the people now pay 40% of the taxes; that 40% of the 95% who he says will receive a tax refund under his plan now pay no taxes at all and thus, they will in effect receive a handout. I do not want my grandchildren to be forever doomed to a middle class status. If they work hard and excel, they should reap the rewards of their efforts. I feel that in our rush to make life “better” for the less productive among us, we destroy the opportunities to achieve for others. I believe that John McCain is committed to our free enterprise system and I fear that Senator O’bama has a hidden agenda that I do not share.
3. Energy Independence . Senator O’bama and his Democratic colleagues have been verbal in their expectation that we should all “suffer” in the current energy crises. His attitude and that of Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reed encompasses a grand commitment to renewable energy, a goal that we all share. However, in the interim, we need and must develop our available energy resources until alternative sources can replace them. We need to develop nuclear energy, wind, solar, etc --all of the above as John McCain so aptly puts it. I fear that Senator O’bama and a Democratic controlled congress will fail us in this pursuit. I believe that Senator McCain will step up to the plate and do what is necessary to make us independent of foreign oil.
4. Taxation. Senator O’bama and his Democratic colleagues are on record as favoring higher income taxes, though they would have us believe they would tax the rich and give to the poor. This is a Robinhood approach and simply speaking, I am not a Robinhood fan. It seems to me that there is credibility in the axiom that people who have plenty feel guilty for their good fortune and therefore demand that the government do more to take care of those less fortunate. By demanding that the government (you and I) take more responsibility, they have soothed their own guilt with little personal sacrifice. In truth, does it not make you feel wonderful to sacrifice in order that the Warren Buffets and Bill Gates of the world can feel good about keeping their own wealth to distribute as they see fit? I believe that Senator McCain will move cautiously on the taxation scene and most of all I believe that he will do his utmost to curtail spending and actively work to balance our budget.
5. Healthcare. Certainly our health care is in a quandary. Our health costs are too high and I understand that there are millions of people who have no health care coverage. However, as I understand the program “touted” by Senator O’bama, those of us who have insurance could keep their own insurance but those who do not, could receive the same insurance as he and Senator McCain. Who among us would not prefer to have the insurance plan that the government employees enjoy? However, can we really afford it? It would seem to me that this is a fast track to socialized medicine. I cannot imagine that many people would be willing to sacrifice the good benefits that the government insured enjoy for the benefits of a privately insured “lean” policy. Further, what company is going to continue to provide insurance if the government offers a better program and administer the paperwork. I am not ready for socialized medicine. In my opinion, it is another step in the socialization of the American dream. In my view, Senator O’bama’s programs are a socialized nightmare. I believe that Senator McCain will make a good effort to improve healthcare without further socializing our way of life.
6. Friends and affiliations. I am sorry but I cannot be other than skeptical that Senator Obama could sit through 20 years of the ranting, raving, Bible thumping tirades of Jeremiah Wright without hearing his condemnation of our country and its people. I do not believe that Senator Obama who I believe to be bright, articulate and well read did not know the history of Bill Ayers or his wife, Bernadine Dorn or their weatherman affiliation. Senator Obama had to know that the actions and association with Tony Reznik were suspect and yet, he casts his action as a “lapse” in judgment. Senator Obama's affiliation with ACORN, an organization whose broad variety of enterprises seems to skirt the ethics of good business practice. causes me to wonder about his truthfulness. Senator O’bama’s association with former heads of Fanny May and Freddie Mac, the entity responsible for the “prime mortgage” meltdown further indicates a strong lapse in good judgment. Sadly, Senator O’bama has conducted his affairs in a naïve manner that suggests flaws in his judgment and I find his character model suspect. Senator McCain, though imperfect in many ways has a record of being “who he says he is”. I like that though I may not always agree with him.
7. THE CONGRESS. At a time when the Congress has an approval rating lower than that of the President, my greatest fear is that in electing Senator Obama we will be adding insult to injury by energizing an incompetent Congress to further incompetence. We will, in my opinion be electing a President whose beliefs, concepts and social views coincides with a Congress that has already proven itself to be inept, incompetent and socialistic in concept and deed. If I had my way about it, every sitting politician now up for reelection, Democrat or Republican, would be turned out and a new group elected. In my opinion, this is the only way the American people could be certain of change. Inasmuch as I can only vote in California, I cannot control the representatives that others “less enlightened” may choose to send to Washington. By voting for Senator McCain, I can vote for someone who can make an “out of control congress” have to work a little harder and perhaps, affect the socialistic direction that seems to be the major priority of too many politicians.
8. CHANGE. We can all agree that change is desirable but who is most likely to implement change and what kind of change? So far there has been a lot of talk about change but the only significant change that I have heard from Senator Obama is a redistribution of wealth. He talks a good talk but his actions thus far have not reflected any commitment to a change that I want to support. He has not participated in any landmark legislation that seems to suggest a commitment to change. He has voted the party line, stayed within his own realm of influence. His change, as I see it, makes good rhetoric but lacks real meritt. He will tax the rich and presumably, give to the poor; he believes that Americans must change their lifestyle and feel the “pain at the pump”; he has a world vision for peace that seems to suggest that he will use the Presidency of the United States to establish a new world order that will provide a stepping stone more clearly aligned to the views and aspirations of the United Nations charter. He does not represent the change that I want to see. John McCain has a history of “fighting for change”. I believe he will achieve real “change” and his years of “experience” will have a better chance of achieving success and change.
9. Judges. I am very much for fair and impartial judges. I do not like the “litmus” test that Democrats seem to want to apply to Judges. I believe in Constitutional Judges, not judges who make law from the bench. I believe that the framers of the Constitution meant to have 3 distinct and separate powers of government. The Presidency who implements, the Congress who creates and the Judges who interpret. Although Senator Obama has stated that he does not believe in a “litmus” test, he does believe that Judges should support his predetermined views and concepts of right and wrong. He seems to believes in Judges who believe it is their duty to nterpret the law in accordance with their personal preconceived ideas. I want to feel that the law has been applied with fairness and without prejudice. I do not believe that Senator Obama will select people who will fairly and indiscriminately render judgments that are based on Constitutional law. I find Senator McCain's judgments in these matters more enlightened, fair and sincere.
10. Education. I agree with Senator Obama that we need to enhance our educational system. We need to fine tune it, improve it and perhaps this would be a good place for him to use his scalpel. I do not believe that money is the answer. I believe in vouchers and I believe in competition in the educational process. I believe that politics in the schools has destroyed our educational system but no one seems to want to correct this – only to make it worse. I do not believe that we need any more educated people whose educational mainstay is to usurp the laws of our land. We need education that teaches our children to think, to rationalize, to employ logic, to negotiate and to explore ideas and research concepts with honesty, in fairness and ethically without malice. Senator Obama seems to believe that education should reflect more taxpayer money dispensed by the government without proper oversight. His educational goals seem to me to be remiss, in view of the fact that we already spend more on education than any country in this world and have fewer intellects. Something is wrong somewhere. John McCain supports vouchers and that is a step forward without unbearable additional costs. I like the voucher concept as a starting point to putting us on "track".
I am concerned that Senator Obama has not released his college grades, that his medical history consists of a one page letter from his physican who states that he is in good health and I am concerned that there are so many lapses in his background. This is his right but until he feels comfortable in opening his life to a public from whom he seeks support, he must do without my vote.
Do I believe that Sarah Palin is ready to be President? -- I believe that Sarah Palin is as ready to be President now as Barak Hussein Obama was when he announced his candidacy for Presidency some nineteen months ago. He has come a long way and he makes a good presentation. However, I believe that Sarah Palin is just as smart, competent and certainly, more committed to the values that I want to preserve as an example of who we are in this country. She is not the candidate for President and thus, she will not be responsible for the “life or death” decisions affecting our country unless John McCain’s service is cut short. I have absolutely no doubt that Governor Palin will be ready to assume the role of president should it become necessary. In fact, I am convinced that she would make a better President than Senator Biden. Senator Biden provides all of us reasons to doubt his “readiness” on a daily basis but the news media simply does not report his “lapses in judgment” beyond a mere cursory casual report that is never repeated.
There you have it – at least I know why I am not voting for Senator O’bama. Do you know why you are voting for him?
Thursday, August 14, 2008
OPEN LETTER TO SENATOR FEINSTEINThank you for responding to my comments. I am fully aware that drilling in ANWR will not solve our immediate energy problems. It would be a step toward our independence on foreign oil in the future. It buys us more time in which to develop our alternative energy resources. We need to tap our every resource and do so immediately. To delay is to continue to underscore our weakness and deplete our treasury.
My husband and I spent three months in Alaska in 2004. We visited with many native Alaskans, talked with many private citizens and saw the Alaskan pipeline as it snaked across the State into Valdez. We saw first hand the effect that the pipeline has on the citizens of Alaska and their quality of life. I believe that the effect of drilling for oil in ANWR is minimal environmentally and I believe that it is in the best interests of the American citizens and certainly the natives of Alaska to throw aside the environmentalist hullabaloo and get to it.
I personally believe that the American people should vote against every candidate (Democrat or Republican) who does not support drilling off shore, in ANWR and in tapping our available resources, wherever they may be. I support nuclear energy and all of the things that the Democrats are against. I fault John McCain for his lack of support for drilling in ANWR.
I sincerely believe that the objections to tapping our natural resources are political in nature and lobbyist oriented. I have listened to all of the hype, -- heard about the pristine beauty of ANWR, risk of drilling off shore and the failure of the oil companies to drill on the 60 million (was that the figure?) acres of leased land. In my opinion, it is ALL POLITICAL RHETORIC. It is time to quit jaw boning and get to it. Whatever shortcomings the oil companies may exhibit – the environmentalists are as bad and perhaps, worse. The oil companies at least want us to have enough money to buy their gas -- the environmentalists would have us hibernate and return to life as savages. It is time we looked ourselves in the mirror and said, ENOUGH to the self serving among us and RIGHT ON to the American dream.
We would not be in this spot if Bill Clinton had not vetoed ANWR in 1995. I personally am fed up with the lack of respect for the US citizen that is prevalent in our elected politicians. It is time we start anew and elect new representatives, Senators, Governors and otherwise. It is time that we send a clear message that we want to be heard and we want to be heard now. It is time for our elected officials to worry more about serving the people and less about reelection. It is time we voted on people based on the job they do -- not the nomenclature of their political affiliation.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)